Results

Recurring Spike Sequences in Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells in the Awake and Sleeping Rat

Abstract

In this chapter I present evidence for the persistence of spatio-temporal spike patterns recorded simultaneously from multiple cells of the CA1 and CA3 area of the rat hippocampus. The temporal structure of the spike trains were investigated via a sequence detection method which extracted spikes closest together in time. The significance of spike sequences were also investigated by calculation of the frequency and expected probability of a spike triplets, co-occurring within 100 and 200 msec time windows. The frequency of identical spike sequences was found to be significantly higher than chance. Spike sequences were stable in terms of (1) the order of 3 to 5 spikes across different cells and (2) the intervals between spikes were invariant with a precision of 10 msec. The statistical significance of sequence repetition was tested by comparing the original spike train with shuffled spike trains using Monte Carlo simulation. The possibility tssibility that sequences are artifacts of periodic modulation of the spike frequency was ruled out. Sequences are hypothesized to represent sequential association of cells as a functional assembly which can support memory function in the hippocampus.

 

Sequence Detection by Template Matching Method

 

The data base consisted of 7 sets of parallel recorded trains from 5 rats. From each tetrode, only the clearest spike clusters with obvious refractory period were used (2 to 5 clusters per tetrode; Csicsvari et al., 1998). In our initial investigations I used the template matching method to search for sequences. The search was exhaustive and examined the repetition of every detected sequence (template). In each search, three parameters of the template were set by the investigator: the number of spikes in a given template (sequence complexity; c), the time window of sequence detection (template window; w), and the time allowed for spike jitter (spike window; dT). The complexity was varied between 3 and 5. The template window was typically set to 200 msec (100 to 400 msec) and the spike window varied from 10 to 50 msec in successive searches (Fig. 3.1d). The dependent variables of the search were the number of different sequences (m), and the number of repetitions of a given sequence (r). I>). During the search, every spike was considered as a part of a template sequence, each template occurred at least once and the entire spike train was completely searched by templates. In practice an rmin parameter was used to set the minimum number of repetitions considered. The rmin was varied between 2 to 30.

Fig. 3.1. An example for spike sequence incidences. (a) A 50 sec period of the activity of 5 simultaneously recorded pyramidal cells during intermittent wheel running episodes (thick horizontal lines) is shown. Individual spikes are represented by gray tics. Spikes which were identified as being a part of one specific repeating sequence of (3,2,0;80,140) (n=40) are marked by squares. (b) The three identical sequences from panel (a) are illustrated in a magnified time scale. The invariant temporal configuration of a, b and c spikes are apparent. (c) The vector type representation of the three incidences of the a-b-c spike sequence.

 

Repetition of spike sequences was observed in every animal investigated. An example of the detection and extraction of recurrirecurring spike sequences from the parallel spike trains is shown in Figure 3.1. Sequences were detected from neurons recorded from both a single electrode or from neighboring electrodes. The number of different sequences (m) detected from a given animal depended upon the number of simultaneously recorded neurons. Spike trains of larger number of simultaneously recorded cells yielded more sequences but spike sequences could be reliably identified in records containing as few as 4 neurons (Fig. 3.1). The number of sequence repetitions (r) depended on the length of the recording. For inter-animal comparisons the data was normalized for 10 cells and 1 min recording time. On average, 10 different sequences were found in a rat which repeated 2.5 (range: 0.2 to 7) times/min. A sequence "initiator" neuron was sometimes part of another spike sequence as a "follower" cell, indicating that the same cell can be a part of different sequences.

As expected, a large number of repeating spike patterns were observed in the wheel-running behavioral task, especially when several "wheel-associated cells" (Czurko et al., 1998) were recorded simultaneously (Fig. 3.1b). The behavior of the animal in this paradigm was rather stereotypic. Following continuous running in the wheel, the rat approached the water spout and after drinking returned to the wheel, usually followingng the same path. Most inter-spike intervals occurred at the 20 to 50 msec and 120-400 msec intervals, even though the exhaustive search allowed for any spike sequences at any interval. Importantly, repeating spike sequences were also present during sleep, again in every rat, when no external reference or motor behavior is available to generate repeating discharge sequences (Fig. 3.1a).

The number of repeating spike sequences detected varied substantially depending on the reference (sequence "initiator") neuron (Fig. 3.2). This observation indicated that the sequences reflected biological mechanisms rather than random processes. To examine quantitatively whether the repeating spike sequences reflected cellular interactions or simply Poissonian coincidences of random events (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988), I compared the original spike trains with their shuffled surrogates.

Fig. 3.2. Examples for spike sequences detected by using the template matching method. The sequences were generated during (a) sleep (11 min) and (b) subsequent wheel running episode (11 min). Each recording includes 4 pyramidal cells. The reference neuron was varied from 0 to 3 (arrows)arrows). The parameters of sequence detection were identical except the rmin (w=200 msec, dt=20 msec). Sequence classes detected from the same reference train are shown superimposed. Sequences with different spatio-temporal patterns are color coded.

 

Comparison of Original and Shuffled Spike Trains by Monte Carlo Simulation

The statistical reliability of the observed repetition of spike sequences was assessed by comparing the mean repetition of the original sequences (rorig) with the mean repetition of the pseudo-random sequences (rrnd ) generated by Monte Carlo simulation. The null-hypothesis was that rorig is equal to rrnd. I reasoned that if the rrnd of every possible sequence in 100 simulated spike trains is smaller, then the rorig, the null hypothesis can be rejected with p<0.01 probability. The hypothesis testing was based on plotting the repetition functions (RF) of the original and shuffled spike trains to the same coordinate system where x=r and y=m (Fig. 3.3). If the original RF is different from the distribution of the shuffled RFs, then the null hypothesis is rejected.

Across-train spike shufflihuffling was carried out on two spike trains from 2 rats and both showed a significant effect on r (p<0.01). The spike sequences detected by the template matching method indicated that repeating spike sequences were usually aligned with less than 20 msec spike jitter and the jitter did not noticeably increase even when longer (as many as 5 spike sequences) were detected. To assess this quantitatively, the effect of the spike window (dT = {2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 msec}) on the incidence of repeated spike sequences was examined (Fig. 3.3). The best separation of the real spike train from shuffled spike trains was observed using 10 to 20 msec spike windows. These observations were consistent in both rats. Therefore, the spike window (dT) in sequence searches and associated Monte Carlo simulations was fixed at either 10 or 20 msec. Figure 3.4 compares repeating spike sequences, obtained from 5 sets of parallel spike trains, with their of Monte Carlo surrogates (100 traces in each case). Shuffling was carried out between the spike trains for these tests since the spike trains contained both theta and non-theta epochs. In all five examples, the number of repeating spike sequences in the surrogates was less than in the original spike trains. The rorig - rrnd difference was significant (P<0.01) in the entire range of sequences (m).

Fig. 3.3. The precision of sequence repetition. Testing the difference between RFs constructed from 100 parallel spike train surrogates and original spike trains. The surrogates were created by across-train spike shuffling. In order to determine the optimal width of theD t spike window (which provides the best separation between shuffled and original spike trains) the RFs were compared at 5 different levels of the D t parameter of sequence detection (D t = {5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 msec}) using the same template matching method. The largest difference can be observed at D t=15 msec. This interval is an estimate for the precision of sequence repetition. Deviation from this interval to both direction makes the difference between shuffled and original spike train less significant. Outside the optimal spike window of 5 to 20 msec the RFs of the shuffled and original spike train start to overlap.

 

 

 

Fig. 3.4. Comparison of repetition functions (RF) between spike train surrogates and real spike trains. The spike train surrogates were constructed by across spike train shuffling. (a-e) Each scatter plot represents RF derived from different animals. The y axis represent the number of different sequences (m) detected by template matching method. The x axis represent the average number of repetitions (r). In each plot the RF of the original spike train was contrasted by the RFs derived from 100 shuffled surrogates. The overlap between the RFs of the surrogates and the RF of the original spike train is proportional to the probability that the sequences of the original spike train were sampled from random and independent spike trains. Note that the repetition rates of the original spike train is always significantly higher than that of the shuffled spike trains (p<0.01). No overlap between the original spike train and surrogates was observed. (f) Superimposed RFs derived from 5 animal. The spike trains were recorded during different behavioral conditions. The curves and the slopes vary from one animal to another. No systematic relationship between number of repetition and behavioral states has been observed.

Quantitative comparison between the original trains and their phase-corrected shuffled surrogates was carrrried out in one data set collected during the wheel running task. The within-spike train shuffling, using the theta-phase correction procedure preserved population dynamics as revealed by the identical theta phase-locked modulation and the similar autocorrelograms of both original and shuffled spikes (Fig. 3.5). Comparison of repeating spike sequences in the original spike trains and their shuffled surrogates indicated that the number of repeating spike sequences was less in each of the 133 shuffled spike trains at all combinations examined.

 

Spike Sequences Detected by the Joint Probability Map Method

A second method used for the visualization of repeated spike sequences was the joint probability map (JPM). In contrast to the template matching method, the length of the spike sequence was limited to three in this analysis. On the other hand, the JPM detected all sequences of spike triplets within a predefined time window (w) regardless of the specific temporal positions of spikes. The distribution of repeating spike triplets was visualized as cumulative values in the bins of a joint peri-event time histogram (Aertsen et al., 1989) . Cross-correlation histograms for spike doublets were also calculated and the random co-occurrences of the corresponding spike doublets (i. e., random triplets) were subtracted from the observed distributiution of triplets, resulting in a histogram of unexpected triplets (JPM, see Methods). The probability of triplets relative to the probability of triplets predicted from the frequency of doublets, was calculated by the Fisher’s exact probability test. In the example shown in Fig. 3.6, high incidence of triplets occurred at the temporal positions between x=50 to 80 msec and y=150 to 190 msec (e.g., 3,2,0;50, 182). The Fisher’s exact probability test revealed 3 significant (p<0.01) triplet positions [(3,2,0;50, 182), (3,2,0;64, 173) and (3,2,0; 72, 154)]. Importantly, these time patterns were similar to the repeating spike sequences, detected by template matching method. When the same procedure was performed on a 100 shuffled versions of the original spike train, no excessive pixels were detected on the joint probability map of sequences (3,2,0). However, significant triplets other than (3,2,0) were detected from the shuffled spike trains.

Fig. 3.5. Comparing phase invariant surrogates with original spike trains in terms of number of sequence repetitions they contain. (a) A 900 msec segment of the original parallel spike train (upper panel) and its phase invariant surrogate (lower panel). Black tics indicate the spikes. The sinusoid trace at the bottom is the schematmatic illustration of the ongoing theta activity. The gray scale background of the spike chart indicates the phase of theta with the vertical dashed lines at the theta peaks. Each spike preserved its phase position when moved to a different theta cycle. (b) Phase cross-correlograms of the original (solid line) and the shuffled spike trains (square symbols). The superimposed plots represent cross-correlograms between theta and single unit activity of one cell. The peaks of the theta oscillation were taken as reference and the spike timing was converted to a phase value relative to the interval between the two successive theta peaks. As a result of phase-invariant shuffling of spikes within the same single unit spike train the phase cross-correlogram between the theta and spikes (square symbols) was identical to the original (solid line). The phase-invariant shuffling did not alter the periodic structure of the spike train of the cell. (c) Comparison of the theta - single unit cross-correlograms between original (solid line) and phase-invariant shuffled spike trains (dashed line). Although, there is a minor difference in the cross-correlograms due to the variation of the theta frequency both spike train shows similar and profound theta modulation. (d) Inter-spike-interval histogram for the original and the shuffled spike train. Both the autocorrelograms and the inter-spike-interval histograms were statistically identical. (f) Comparison of the RFs between the shuffled and original spike trains. The distribution of phase-invariant shuffled spike train RFs is significantly different from the original spike train RF indicated by no overlap between them. Hence periodic modulation does not itself generate as many sequential structures as were observed in the original spike train.

To examine the hypothesis that significantly repeating triples in JPMs are more frequently present in the original spike trains than in their shuffled surrogates, 100 JPMs were created from the shuffled correlates of the 5 original data sets, shown in Fig. 3.7. For each data set, 3 separate JPMs were created, using 5, 6.7 and 10 msec bins. All together 1500 (100 x 5 x 3) JPMs were analyzed. In these tests, within-spike train randomization was used. Spikes were displaced in time by adding random intervals from -25 to 25 msec (shuffling procedure 3; see Methods). In Figure 3.7, the number of significant pixels in the JPMs of the shuffled spike trains are contrasted with the original spike train. The number of repeating spike triplets in the original data sets was significantly larger than in the shuffled correlates.

Fig. 3.6. Sequence mapping and significance testing. (a) The "joint peri-event time histogram" (JPTH) represents the frequency of a spike triplets (3,2,0) which must be occurred in constant temporal order but at any temporal positions relative to the reference spikes (neuron#3) as a trigger event. The total 200 msec time window was subdivided into 44 identical bins (4.54 msec intervals) resulting in total 1936 pixels. The gray scale of the pixels is proportional to the number of spike triplets detected at a specific temporal position. The x coordinate of the histogram represents the latency of the cell#2 spikes relative to the cell#3 spikes when cell#2 firing was followed by a cell#0 spike. The y coordinate represents the latency of cell#0 spikes relative to cell#3 firing when the cell#0 spike was preceded by cell#2 firing. The histograms at the left side and below the JPTH represent the total counts of triplets at each D t3,0 and D t3,2 positions, respectively. (b) An expected JPTH was constructed based on the assumption that triplets are random coincidences of spike doublets. The original triplets (3,2,0) were decomposed to spike doublets of (3,2), (3,0(3,0) and (2,0). These spike doublets were collected by the "cross-correlogram 3-2" (immediate below), "cross-correlogram 2-0" (second below) and "cross-correlogram 3-0" (left). The expected probability distribution of spike triplets at any temporal position was computed as a product of the probability of the three spike-doublets at the corresponding temporal position based on the assumption that the doublet coincidence counts follow Poisson distribution. The probability function of the expected triplets were multiplied by the number of the actually detected triplets resulting in the expected frequency distribution of triplets. The gray scale is proportional to the expected frequency. (c) The joint probability map (JPM). JPM represents the distribution of triplets expressed as the difference between the expected and observed JPTH. The difference was visualized by subtracting the expected frequency distribution from the observed frequency distribution (JPTH). Here the gray scale of a pixel is proportional to the frequency at which the frequency of observed triplets overrides the number expected triplets at any specific pixel position. Superposition of the result of the Fisher's exact probability test on the difference map indicates the pixels at which the difference between the frequency of expected and observed triplets was significant (P<0.01). In this example three regions were found to be significant at (3,2,0;50, 182), (3,2,0;64, 173) and (3,2,0; 72, 154) positions. (d) Vector representation of sequences extracted by the template matching method. Note that the latencies of the three (3,2,0) triplet classes (in colors) are identical to the temporal positions of the significant peaks on (c) (dashed lines). The frequency of triplets at different latencies are represented by the histograms superimposed on the vector plot.

 

A further comparison between the template search method and the JPM method was carried out by splitting the recorded session into two halves. I tested whether the spike sequence identified by the template method in the first half of the session can predict the excessive occurrence of the same triplet in the second half as identified by the JPM method. For this test, a wheel running session was selected and I assumed that the behavior of the rat and the environmental effects on the animal were similar throughout the recording time (continuous 20 min). The first half was scanned by the template matching algorithm. The most frequently repeating sequence pattern was a spike triplet of neurons 2, 4 and 0 (2,4,0;30-40, 120-130; Fig. 3.8a). A JPM was constructed from the second half of the recording session. The significant pixels, detected at 40 msec (x = cell 4-2) and 125 m25 msec (y = cell 2-0), matched the spike detected from the first half of the session (Fig. 3.8b). In addition, significant pixels detected from the first and second halves of the recording sessions were superimposed (Fig. 3.8c). The overlap of the significant pixels, identified from the first and second halves of the recording session, also indicated that spike sequences occurred relatively homogeneously throughout the recording session rather than confined to certain unusual events during the recording.

 

Fig. 3.7. Main comparison between the original and shuffled spike trains regarding the number of significant triplets they contain. Five animals (gray panels) were tested for statistically significant triplets at 3 different bin sizes of the JPM (5, 6.7 and 10 msec) as indicated by the abscissa. The number of the significant triplets detected from 100 shuffled spike trains (-) relative to the number of significant triplets detected from the original spike train (100%) is expressed in percentage and indicated by the ordinate. At bin size 6.7 msec all animals show significantly more statistically significant triplets in the original spike database than in the shuffled database (P<0.01).

 

 

 

Fig. 3.8. The consistency of "template matching" method and "joint-probability mapping". A "split-half" test was carried out between the two half of the original spike trains. The validity of the sequence prediction made on the basis of the first half of the recording was tested by comparing the sequences with the significant sequences detected from the second half. (a) The first 10 min period was tested by template matching method for repeating sequences (n = 3; rmin = 5; ref = 2; w = 200 ms; dt = 10 ms). The 3 main classes of sequences (2,4,0; 20,120), (2,4,0;40,125) and (2,1,4;25,40) are superimposed. The ISIs of 2-4 and 2-0 joint sequences are indicated by the t1 and t2 intervals, respectively. (b) The second 10 min period of the same recording was tested for the significant repetition of 2,4,0 triplets by joint-probability mapping method. The total 200 ms interval was subdivided to 23 (8.7msec) intervals. The pixels where significant (p<0.01) triplets were detected are outlined. The corresponding t1 and t2 delays are indicat indicated by arrows. Please, note that the pixel position of the significant triplets are in perfect match to the sequences detected from the first half of the recording. (c) Superposition of the temporal positions of sequences detected to be significant (p<0.01) in the first half (à ) and second half (+) of the spike trains. The pixel sizes were varied from 4 to 20 msec. All the significant temporal positions are represented. Note that the clusters of significant areas are overlapping. Most of the significant sequences were detected at temporal position t1 and t2 (dashed lines).

 

 

 

Behavioral modulation of spike sequences

The majority of spike sequences were either shorter than 50 msec or longer than 100 msec. In general, short sequences dominated in slow wave sleep whereas the longer sequences occurred in the awake animal or during REM sleep (e. g., Fig. 3.2). To quantify this observation, I examined the EEG correlates of short and long duration sequences of the same neurons. Two epochs were extracted from the EEG including the first spike of the sequence as time zero. The shorter epoch (204.8 msec) provided a more precise estimate of thete of the exact EEG state, whereas the longer one (-819.2 msec to 2,457.6 msec) was used to assess the EEG power at lower frequencies. Power spectra, calculated from the short and long EEG epochs (0 to 300 Hz and 0 to 20 Hz, respectively), revealed that short spike sequences were associated with a significant peak at 140-200 Hz, corresponding to field "ripples" in the EEG (Buzsáki et al., 1992). Conversely, the long spike sequences were associated with oscillatory fields at theta frequency (Fig. 3.9).

Fig. 3.9. The correspondence of theta activity with long sequences and ultrafast oscillation with short sequences. (a) Low frequency band power spectra of the ongoing EEG activity during epochs of long sequences (solid line) and the power spectra of the EEG during short versions of the same sequences are superimposed. The theta component of the EEG power spectra during long sequences is significantly larger (P<0.0001) than the same component of the power spectra during short sequences. Inset (1): The density histogram of the theta peaks. Theta had a median at 7.5 Hz. Inset (2): The long sequences. (b) Wide frequency band power spectra of the ongoing EEG during long and short sequences. The high frequency (160-200Hz) co components of the power spectra during short sequences is significantly larger (P<0.0001) than that of the long sequences. Consequently, long sequences coincide with theta activity and short sequences coincide with ultra fast oscillation epochs. Inset (1): The density histogram of the ultrafast oscillation has a median at 160 Hz.

 

The above findings implicate that sequences spanning the theta cycle during awake behavior are appear in a compressed manner during sharp wave-associated ripples when the animal is in the slow wave sleep state. I therefore addressed the issue whether behaviorally imposed sequences could increase the probability of occurrence of the same sequences during subsequent slow wave sleep. In one rat, the spatial position of the clusters and the shape of the autocorrelograms of the individual units were identical during Sleep 1, wheel running and Sleep 2 sessions, indicating the stable recording from the same neurons over time. As discussed above, some pyramidal cells were selectively active in the wheel (wheel-associated place cells; Czurko et al., 1998) while others were active in the adjacent box while the rat performed the task repeatedly. As Figure 3.10 illustrates, new spike sequences were present during the wheel running task, in addition to several of the spike sequences detected during thg the preceding sleep session. Importantly, the newly emerging spike sequence also occurred at a high probability during the subsequent sleep period.

For the statistical analysis of the behavioral effect on sequence generation and persistence, the significance of all possible triplets (n=72) were compared across the three successive behavioral states: sleep phase1 (SLEEP1), wheel running behavior (RUN) and sleep phase2 (SLEEP2), 11 min each. The number of significant triplets were calculated for each variations by using Fisher's exact probability test. All together 72 triplet variation were investigated with usingw=200 msec time window and 5 msec bin size. I compared the non-parametric distributions of the significant triplets between SLEEP1 and RUN and between RUN and SLEEP2. The chi-square test resulted in significant difference between the distribution of SLEEP1 and RUN triplets. In contrast there was no significant difference in the distribution of the significant triplets between RUN and SLEEP2 (Fig. 3.10). The result is consistent with the hypothesis that (1) sequences are altered by experience, (2) sequences which were generated during active behavior tend to persist during subsequent sleep behavior. Also, as consistent with the power spectra analysis, triplets detected during sleep (including slow wave sleep) were compressed at 2-5 times relative to the order-identitical sequences occurred during run.

Fig. 3.10. The distribution of the number of significant triplets detected during successive sleep1, run and sleep2 behavioral epochs. Note that large peaks of sleep1 sequences (e.g. sequence 1,2,0) disappeared and new variations (1,3,2 and 2,0,3) appeared during wheel running which were persistent during sleep-2. The overall distribution of significant triplets was altered between sleep1 and run (chi-square=0.009, P=0.923) by increased presence of sequences initiated by neuron#2. The altered distribution was maintained during the subsequent sleep period (chi-square=13.265, P<0.0001).

 

 

Discussion

 

SEQUENCES VS. BY CHANCE COINCIDENCES OF SPIKES

I have presented evidence for temporal coordination in multi-neuronal spike trains. Significant repetitions of spike configurations were observed in the original spike trains when compared to shuffled surrogates and Poissonian combinatonian combination of cross-correlograms. The consistency of spike sequences within the same behavioral condition has been demonstrated by "split half" test. I have also illustrated the concordance of the different sequence detection methods on the same database. Sequences were present regardless of the method of detection. Finally, I have demonstrated the dependence of sequence preservation on successive behavioral states. Sequence preservation in association with sequence compression occurs when sleep states follow running states.

Temporal coordination of spikes, in relation to the stimulus presentation, has been described in the locust's antennal lobe (Laurent, 1996), in the crab somatogastric ganglion (Marder & Calabrese, 1996), in the crayfish (Dayhoff and Gerstein, 1983a-b) and in various neocortical areas of cats (Frostig et al., 1990; Baranyi & Feher, 1981; Kirkwood and Sears, 1991; Singer & Gray, 1995; Gray et al., 1992; Ts’o et al., 1986; Eckhorn, 1991) and monkeys (Abeles, 1993; Abeles et al., 1993; Aertsen et al., Vaadia & Abeles, 1987; Strehler and Lestienne, 1986; Riehle et al., 1997; Mechler et al., 1998).

The repetition of spike patterns is not unexpected (Lisman and Idiart, 1995), considering that the hippocampus is involved in memory formation and consolidation (Scoville and Milner, 1957; Zola-Morgan et al., 1982) and mnd maintenance of short-term memories is likely to require repetitive activation of neuronal circuitries (Hebb, 1949). At the experimental level, it has been shown that the participation of neurons in population patterns is not random (Ylinen et al., 1995) and the spatio-temporal coordination of spikes within neuronal assemblies can occur without a change in firing rate of the individual cells (Buzsáki et al., 1992). Furthermore, neuron pairs which represented the same part of the environment in the awake rat, and therefore fired together during exploration, showed an increased correlation during the subsequent slow wave sleep episode relative to a preceding sleep episode (Wilson and McNaughton, 1994; Skaggs and McNaughton, 1995). These findings suggest that the firing pattern of different neurons is not random and the spatio-temporal activity of hippocampal neurons are modifiable by experience.

Repeating spike sequence patterns mostly have been reported in stimulus presentation paradigms (Laurent, 1996, Abeles, 1993, Dayhoff and Gerstein et al., 1983; Riehle, 1997). To date, spontaneous occurrences of invariant spatio-temporal patterns (sequences) have only been detected in basal forebrain areas associated with cardiac and respiratory activity (Frostig,1990; Riehle, 1997). Spike sequences may recur by chance or can be generated by causal mechanism oof neuronal interactions. Separation between these two possibilities is complicated by the non-stationary nature of neuronal spike trains (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988; Softky and Koch, 1992). For example, periodic modulation of spike frequency in cell assemblies can lead to the emergence of repeating spatio-temporal discharges of the participating neurons. As a result, statistical tests based on the stationarity of the events may reveal spurious sequences. In the experiments described above, I examined whether recurring spike sequences are present in the awake and sleeping animal. Since hippocampal pyramidal neurons are considered to be "place" cells (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978), it is expected that neurons are activated sequentially when the animal visits different locations or performs a task in certain temporal order in a structured environment (Wilson and McNaughton, 1994). During sleep, on the other hand, there is no external reference or motor behavior to drive hippocampal cells. Therefore, if recurring spike sequences are present during sleep, they are likely to be generated internally. Simultaneously recorded pyramidal cell assemblies were recorded in rats, trained to run in a wheel, and in sleeping animals. Spatio-temporal sequences of spike patterns were detected by either a "template matching" method or by the joint probabilities of spikes. The significance of sequence repetition was tested by various Monte Carlo shuffling methods and by calculating the chance probabilities of spike sequences from spike doublets. The results indicate that repeating spike sequences are present in both the awake and sleeping animal in excess of what might be predicted by random variations.

A critical issue that must be addressed is whether the repeating spike sequences shown here are generated by biological mechanisms or emerged simply as a result of random coincidences of spike trains. Repeating spike patterns have been reported in several cortical and subcortical structures (Lindsey et al., 1997). However, validation of statistical significance of these patterns has been difficult due to a variety of factors. Although Monte Carlo significance tests can reliably examine a null hypothesis, the choice of the proper shuffling protocol is critical. The ideal shuffling protocol should maintain the discharge frequency of individual spike train constant and should not alter the population dynamics of the parallel-recorded neurons.

The number of spuriously occurring spike sequence patterns increases rapidly with discharge frequency (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988). Therefore, proper comparison of the original and shuffled spike trains requires that the discharge frequency of neurons should not be altered significantly by tby the shuffling procedure. If the dynamics of cortical neurons could be described by a Poisson process (Bair and Koch, 1996; Shadlen and Newsome, 1998), within-spike train randomization of spike occurrences would be appropriate since this procedure does not alter the average firing rate of the individual neurons. Unfortunately, random shuffling within the same spike train may alter the correlation structure of the parallel spike trains. This issue is very important in the hippocampal formation, since firing patterns of pyramidal cells are dynamically modulated by behavior. In the exploring animal population synchrony is periodically modulated at theta frequency. In the absence of rhythmic theta waves, irregularly occurring sharp wave bursts are present during which population synchrony of neurons increases 4 to 8-fold (Csicsvari et al., 1998). In order to retain population behavior and associated firing rate changes, three additional shuffling protocols were used. First, spikes were randomly shuffled across spike trains (Fig. 3.2d). Although this method preserves population dynamics perfectly, it tends to decrease the firing rate differences of individual neurons in the original spike trains. In the second (Fig. 3.2b), third (Fig. 3.2c) and forth (Fig. 3.5a) methods, shuffling was carried out within the same spike trains. In the forth method, shifting spikes was always phase-locked to phase of theta activity and all neighboring spikes within a theta cycle were shifted together. This shuffling procedure retained spike dynamics both within and across spike trains. However, the method can be applied only to relatively stationary data sets (e. g., continuous theta epochs). The third method (Fig. 3.2c) shifted spikes randomly within 50 msec with the goal of retaining the population synchrony across spike trains during theta waves and sharp waves. Independent of the shuffling method used, significant repetition of spike sequences were found in each animal.

The joint probability map was a complementary method for the extraction of repeating spike sequences in parallel-spike trains. The joint probability map can be considered as a multineuronal extension of the cross-correlation method. It searches for precisely repeating spike triplets and provides information that is not available by using a cross-correlation method (see Chapter 2). Sequences that emerge as random occurrences of spike doublets are eliminated and the excessive number of triplets are determined Fischer’s exact probability statistics. The window method and the joint probability method detected similar spike sequences. Importantly, the sequences detected by one method in the first part of the recording session reliably predicted the sequences detected by the other method in the remaining part of the session.

In summary, repeating spike sequences were found more frequently in our parallel-recorded spike trains than expected by chance, independent of the sequence detection method or the shuffling procedure. It should be emphasized, however, that each method used in this study has shortcomings, as discussed above. Therefore, the conclusions based on these methods should remain tentative until more reliable mathematical tools become available for the analysis of the temporal relationship among coactive neurons. Nevertheless, it should also be emphasized that the number of different sequences, the number of repeating spike sequences and the number of spikes within a given sequence (complexity) varied even within the same data set depending on the neuron which served as a sequence-initiator. These observations, together with the behavioral modification of spike sequences, indicate that the observed spike sequences could not be fully accounted for by random coincidences of neuronal discharges of hippocampal cells.

 

EXTERNALLY CONTROLLED AND INTERNALLY GENERATED RECURRING SPIKE SEQUENCES

Spike sequences were observed in both the awake and sleeping animal. The structured discharges during sleep could be a consequence of some hard-wiring (Deadwyler et al., 1996) or may reflect synaptiynaptic changes as a result of learning in the awake animal. We have hypothesized earlier that the behavior-dependent electrical changes in the hippocampal formation (theta and sharp SPW-associated states) might subserve a two-stage process of information storage (Buzsáki, 1989). SPWs bursts, which invade the CA1 region and deep layers of the entorhinal cortex, are hypothesized to transfer the stored representations to neocortical networks. Explicit predictions of this model are that neuronal patterns during SPW bursts are a consequence of learning in the awake brain and that the learned sequences of neuronal discharges are replayed during SPWs in a time-compressed manner. In accordance with the model, Wilson and McNaughton (1994) and Skaggs and McNaughton (1995) found that neuron pairs, which represented similar parts of the environment, and therefore fired together during exploration, showed an increased correlation during the subsequent slow wave sleep episode compared to a preceding sleep episode. Cells that had non-overlapping spatial firing or were inactive during exploration did not show increased correlation. The present finding confirm and extend these observations. Using a similar design, I found that spike sequences, which were activated during behavioral training in the wheel-running task, were preserved in the subsequent slow wave sleep episode. Furthermore, the spike sequences during sleep were compressed in time and were associated with SPW-ripples. What could be the physiological importance of these events? As hypothesized elsewhere, the SPW population bursts in the CA3-CA1-subiculum-entorhinal cortex axis could provide a necessary depolarization force required for synaptic modification of their neocortical targets (Chrobak and Buzsáki, 1994).

TEMPORAL COORDINATION AND SEQUENCE REPETITION

Precise temporal coordination of APs and repetition are empirically inseparable properties of the spike trains. Precise coordination in an absence of external trigger event is detectable only on the basis of repetition. Although repetition and temporal coordination are co-occurring properties they may have different biological determinants. First we consider the determinants of AP timing and coordination.

Assuming that the statistical reliability of the excessive spike sequences in the hippocampus will withstand further scrutiny, the important question to ask is whether they serve any important physiological role (Lisman, 1998). Precisely coordinated spike timing has been observed previously in both cortical and subcortical systems (Laurent, 1996; Marder & Calabrese, 1996; Dayhoff and Gerstein, 1983a-b; Frostig et al., 1990; Baranyi & Feher, 1981; Ki981; Kirkwood and Sears, 1991; Singer & Gray, 1995; Gray et al., 1992; Ts’o et al., 1986; Eckhorn, 1991; Abeles, 1993; Abeles et al., 1993; Aertsen et al., Vaadia & Abeles, 1987; Strehler and Lestienne, 1986; Riehle,et al., 1997). In many of these studies, however, the spike sequences are likely to have involved both principal cells and inhibitory interneurons. Separation of principal and interneuron classes is important because (1) it has been suggested that coincident discharge of presynaptic neurons is critical for the emergence of precisely repeating spike sequences (Abeles, 1982; Softky and Koch, 1993), (2) interneurons may function as coincidence detectors (Geiger et al., 1997) and (3) it has been argued that cortical pyramidal cells perform pure algebraic averaging (Shadlen and Newsome, 1995; 1998). The latter authors went further and suggested that in cortical structures, spike times and sequences do not convey any information. This conclusion is based on the assumptions that principal cells are linear devices, the distribution of interspike intervals resemble a random (Poisson) point process and that net excitatory and inhibitory inputs are balanced (Shadlen and Newsome, 1998). I have to note that neither of the latter assumptions are supported by recent empirical data.

Recent studies on individual pyramidal neurons and their network interactions suggest that t pyramidal cells are highly non-linear neurons (Yuste and Denk, 1995; Spruston et al., 1995; Magee and Johnston, 1997; Markram et al., 1997; Kamondi et al., 1998a) and they are equipped with intrinsic oscillatory properties (Llinas, 1988; Huguenard and McCormick, 1992; Penttonen et al., 1998; Kamondi et al., 1998b). Hippocampal pyramidal cells are embedded in an oscillatory network of interneurons (Buzsáki and Chrobak, 1995; Jefferys et al., 1996). The timing of pyramidal cell action potentials is modulated by theta (5-10 Hz), gamma (40-100 Hz) and ultrafast (200 Hz "ripples") rhythms rather than by a random process. Within these oscillatory patterns, the ratio of excitation to inhibition can vary substantially (Rudell and Fox, 1984; Buzsáki et al., 1981). During the time window of the ripple, the relative ratio of excitation to inhibition transiently can increase up to 300 percent (Csicsvari et al., 1998). Furthermore, the occurrence of action potentials on the hyperpolarizing phase of the intracellular theta cycle is much less likely than during the rising phase, most likely due to the slow modulation of a K+ current (Kamondi et al., 1998b). Interestingly, place cells in the hippocampus tend to discharge on the theta phase opposite to the discharge of the "background" population (O’Keefe and Recce, 1993; Skaggs et al., 1996). The expected consequence of these intrinsic and network effects is that temporal coordination of presynaptic spikes is an important factor that affects the probability of the postsynaptic response. In short, oscillatory systems provide " temporal windows of opportunity" to selectively suppress or enhance the effectiveness of presynaptic activity. As a result, members of a given spike sequence, as shown here, could exert a differential impact on their postsynaptic targets.

 

Spike sequences can be generated due to nonlinear interactions between the input and the actual state of the cell at a cellular level. As a result, EPSPs occuring within a certain interval are amplified relative to those which do not occur in that time range. The consequence is that the output is not the actual arithmetic sum of the input but rather a function of the temporal pattern of the input. The network-level effect of this type of temporal filtering is that APs are precisely scheduled relative to the ongoing network activity.

A network-level coordination of spikes may occur due to a reverberation of the APs or a consistent external drive. The reverberation hypothesis was first proposed by Hebb (1949). According to the this hypothesis APs propagate in a circuit of interconnected cells as in a closed-loop. In a sparse-connectivity network, many closed-lood-loops can be formed on a random basis. Recently, sparsely connected networks became a subject of intensive study (e.g. Amit, 1989). Attractor dynamics are likely to occur within sparsely connected network under certain conditions (Amit, 1989). The network dynamics will converge to a sequence of steady states i.e. to the limit cycle attractor which best supports the coincident input activity to specific cells. More precisely, only those feed-back loops will be stabilized which converge back to the already active cells. According to computer simulations, the conditions necessary for repetition to occur are as follows: (1) spontaneous activity of some cells, (2) fixed refractory periods and (3) feed-back loops in the network (Nadasdy, 1998). The anatomy of the hippocampus CA3 recurrent collateral system is consistent with a sparsely connected network with feed-back loops. In a recurrent collateral system, no rhythmic external stimulation is necessary to generate and maintain the AP sequences. The maintenance is provided by the spontaneous pacemaker activity of certain tonically active cells. Alternatively, interneurons may support a rhythmic hyperpolarization of the pyramidal cells making them coherently exit from hyperpolarized states (Buzsaki, Chrobak, 1995). A small fraction of cells with intrinsic oscillatory properties (<10%) is sufficient to maintain the spatio-temporal pattern in the network (unpublished observation). Since there are many steady states of oscillations are supported by a sparsely connected random network the external input can switch between these states. Environmental stimulation thus can serve as a perturbation which forces the network to settle down in one of several oscillatory states.

Alternatively, in the absence of intrinsic pacemaker activity, a congruent external drive is capable generating AP sequences in a sparsely connected network. During a consistent stereotypical behavior state, the spike emission may be coordinated and the pattern of spikes may repeat as many times as the same sensory cues occur. When the animal is taking the same path in a maze or running in a wheel, sensory input such as the visual flow follows the same temporal order. As a result, the sensory drive to the hippocampal cells is also consistently repeated. The repetitive activation of the pyramidal cells within the same context of environmental stimuli may cause cells to fire in the same temporal relationship. This explanation can be tested within a behavioral paradigm, where the running path of the animal is continuously monitored and the locomotion could be correlated with the emergence of spike sequences.

RECURRING SPIKE SEQUENCES: DO THEY HAVE A PURPOSE?

The stThe statistical significance of sequence repetition does not necessarily imply functional significance. Sequences can be epiphenomena that are products of cellular interactions but never are utilized by the nervous system. However, precise temporal resolution and comparison of spikes on a sub-millisecond time scale have been described in relationship to sound localization (Konishi et al., 1988). We know from studies on the barn owl auditory system that sub-millisecond ranges of relative delays between APs can precisely be discriminated by neurons which have a much longer time constant. The basis for the fine temporal discrimination is a set of neuronal delay circuits. The inter Aural delays are converted to a topographic map of the cells which receive synchronous inputs from the both ears. The active cell then presumable indicates the relative direction of the sound source in three dimensional space (Konishi et al., 1988).

Whether hippocampal pyramidal cells make use of any available temporal coding or not we do not know. The behavioral modulation (induction, persistence and compression) suggests that spike sequences may represent a type of population codes that efficiently encodes different information by different temporal patterns that are superimposed on the same population of cells.

Functionally the hippocampus can be consideridered as a "filter" which extracts relevant information from the sensory space for permanent storage in the neocortex. Any kind of population-level temporal organization of spikes that is (1) specific for the new experiences and (2) persistent across active behavior and sleep is a candidate for memory trace. If sequences can be correlated with sensory configurations or with the presence of objects in the environment, like place fields are, then the question of memory representation by sequences can be addressed more precisely. Until then, we can investigate the sequence preservation across different behavioral states. This can be accomplished by comparing the statistical significance of the spike sequences across unrelated behavioral states (such as sleep and run) and related behavioral states (such as run and sleep). As I have demonstrated the spectral distribution of significant sequences detected during run is independent from the spectral distribution of sequences detected during preceding sleep state. In contrast the spectral distribution of sequences during continuous running behavior was not independent from the sequences observed during the subsequent sleep state. This finding suggests that the information represented by the sequences during active exploration are transferred to the sleep phase for further consolidation. Independent of this analysis, I found that sequences are repeated in a compressed manner during sharp wave episodes, which are the dominant field events during slow wave sleep. Based on these two findings, I assume that those sequences which were generated during active exploratory behavior are transferred in a compressed format to the subsequent sleep state and being replayed during sharp-waves. The functional relevance of sharp-waves is that they are associated with high frequency population discharges which are hypothesized to reactivate synaptic connections which have been pre-potentiated earlier during theta activity (Buzsaki, 1987). As a result sharp-waves induce permanent synaptic modifications in the entorhinal and neo-cortical targets. The frequency range of sharp wave associated discharges (recorded as 200 Hz ripple) is the same as the frequency range of LTP induction. As such, sharp waves are potential candidates for the biological induction of LTP-type of plasticity (Buzsaki, 1987).

Assuming that hippocampal pyramidal cells are linked to different functional assemblies which emit APs in a deterministic sequence, we can ask what is the probability of detecting recurring sequences. If population coding is stochastic and precise timing is an exception rather than a rule, the chance of recording from the fraction of cells which shows this property is rather low. However, the fact that sequences repeated significantly more than by chance suggests that all cells are i indeed engaged in functional assemblies and the probability of observing sequences depends on how many cells we are able to monitor. Since there is no known topography in the distribution of hippocampal cell assemblies, the probability of detecting functionally connected cells is proportional to the number of cells recorded. Since I have shown significant sequence repetition generated by as few as four pyramidal cells I assume that the engagement of individual cells in a larger functional network is rather strong. Those spikes which were not identified as a part of a sequence can be considered to be a part of sequences outside of the scope of our recording.

In the near future, using more multiple electrode arrays we should be able to record hundreds of cells simultaneously. Based on this technique, we will be able to infer the spatio-temporal distribution of the population code over the cell assemblies and the estimate the extent that neurons are associated with each other.